|
|
THE MARTHA STEWART
SYNDROME | There's an element of
greed that seems to takes over as some people gain more and
more wealth, until it becomes so all consuming that nothing
becomes more important than continued acquisition of numerous
large homes, art treasures, fine cars and
money. Many men and women, as they
become wealthier, seem to lose all sense of honor,
decency and shame, end up in prison, some for the rest of heir
lives, or at least the years they should enjoy the most, in
peace and comfort, loved and respected by their families.
Why do become
more and more acquisitive, sacrificing their humanity,
jettisoning friendships and close relationships of many years
that they once held dear, seeking only the wealthy as
friends? Eventually their rapaciousness often
causes them to lose their sense of balance, of right and
wrong, and to them wealth makes right, not right makes
right. Rudderless, they veer off course and into
the shoals, then upon the rocks of disaster.
I call it The
Martha Stewart Syndrome because she obviously was the best
known personality of the long list of those who ran afoul of
the law, not because she was evil or a major conspirator, but
she did get caught up in the problem over money.
MARTHA
STEWART
Martha Stewart
might well be used as an example; she got into difficulty that
began, reportedly, as an act which might have saved her
somewhere around $50,000, as she was first accused of using
insider information to avoid a small stock loss in
the IMClone stock she held. The accusation was never proven,
but the loss would have been about 1/10 of 1% of her net
worth, which at the time was close to a billion dollars, and
the investigation alone brought on multiple problems that
never should have happened to her.
She was the founder and CEO of Martha
Stewart Living Omni-media, and one of the world's wealthiest
and best
known women.
As the
case dragged on it caused a drop in the value of the
stock in her company, damage to her name and reputation, and
the small loss she had faced grew to hundreds of
millions,
in fact, about 50% of her total worth vanished as the
value of her companies' stock fell dramatically.
The retirement funds of
many of her loyal followers were jeopardized and the many of
the faithful felt betrayed.
But, her stock-holders suffered too,
in the same percentage of losses as she, because of
that perceived mistake in judgment. There
were untold hardships for many who simply could not
afford such losses. Her moral compass no longer
seemed pointed to "true North." The mistake she she was
accused of making was seemingly small, but the
consequences were large for herself and others. Her
legal costs alone far eclipsed the minor losses she would
have suffered.
She was not punished for the
allegations of profiting from Insider Trading based upon
conversations with Samuel Waksal; she was punished for lying
to the investigators, to a Federal officer. She has paid
a price; she is back doing what she does best, and that should
be the end of it. It's over.
There were some reports of her
demands upon and nastiness to subordinates that were reported
as the investigation and coverage of her financial and legal
problems dragged on. I'm sure she may still be a
perfectionist, but the experience must have changed
her. When the wealthy or powerful fall, the
jackals move in to rip as much flesh off the carcass as
possible. Personally, I hate to see such things happen,
as I am one who would rather choose to cheer on the
successful, yet the fallen are such contemptible rapacious
characters that they well deserve mention. It helps us
to understand that for some no scheme nor conspiracy is
too devious, too vile, nor involves too much money.
SAMUEL D. WAKSAL, CEO
ImClone Systems, Inc. - 2002
A close friend of Martha Stewart
and the founder of ImClone Systems, he used insider
information that one of the company's products was not going
to be approved by government agency, which would bring
about a price drop in the stock, so he sold out before the
general public could learn about it, according to the
Feds.
Leona
Helmsley, of the Helmsley Hotels, was another woman whose
exploits became fodder for the scandal sheets, her greed so
overcame every sense of decency, that her inhumanity to
employees was legendary. Her mistreatment of others
made her sound more like the Evil Witch in the Hansel and
Gretel story than a human being. They wrote that
she seemed to take pleasure in firing workers whose livlihood
and well-being depended upon their jobs, putting them and
their families at risk.
BERNARD EBBERS,
CEO WORLDCOM
Greed? Look at
Bernard Ebbers, former CEO of WorldCom, who cost shareholders
billions, depleting the retirement funds of millions of
average people, one of them my sister, a widow with
a serious heart problem. Ebbers, a Sunday School teacher
turned out to be a master of deceit, even lying to the
children in his church. On March 15, 2005 he was
convicted of an $11 billion dollar accounting
fraud. Prior to that, in the year 2000, he was on Forbes
list of 400 richest Americans, at $780 million; today he is in
prison, and perhaps he'll die there.
The loss of
their retirement funds most likely caused heart attacks and
early deaths to many investors, extreme hardships to
others. They will suffer for years too. Prison may
punish the guilty, but those outside the walls, innocent
investors, can suffer equally.
DENNIS
KOZLOWSKI, CEO TYCO
Dennis
Kozlowski of Tyco robbed the company that was paying him
millions a year out of many millions more, without it
bothering his conscience at all. While he was worth
hundreds of millions, he still schemed to cheat the State of
New York out of sales tax on the expensive art he purchased, a
ten million dollar panting by Renoir, avoiding a million
dollars in sales tax. At the same time the art
dealers whom he persuaded to cooperate with him faced criminal
charges in New York too. In the end, it turned out, he was
nothing more than a cheap chiseler, and another one who
reportedly was extremely rude to those who worked for
him. Why did this wealthy CEO, a man who threw a $2
million dollar birthday party for his wife, get into trouble
when he did not need to do so?
KENNETH LAY
& RICHARD SKILLING
Then there's
Kenneth Lay, the CEO of Enron, seemingly on top of the world
until it all dropped out from under him. They had
devised, the Government said, a scheme to create artificial
shortages in the electrical power field so that they could
make millions more, added to those millions they had already
accumulated. Also at Enron was Jeffrey Skilling, now
facing a lifetime behind bars...and the list goes on and on
and on. Greed? There is never enough money to satisfy
the greed of some, not enough art, not enough homes, not
enough power that goes with the wealth.
CONRAD BLACK
(4/18/07)
Media mogul
charged with a $60 million dollar fraud, currently on
trial. His former partner has pled guilty and will
testify for the Government about the scheme. Why do the
rich get into trouble when they don't need to do
so?
This trial,
still going on in court today, in which his former partner
testifies against him, shows that those in the wealthy
class , big business moguls, multi-millionaires, who
become involved in fraudulent schemes treat millions and even
hundreds of millions of dollars as casually as the small-time
crook hits and ATM for a couple of hundred dollars.
THE
CREDIT CARD CARTEL IS IN THE SAME LEAGUE.
When corporate executives conspire, literally, to pit one group
against another by the introduction of bribery into
almost every business transaction, an act that causes the
first group (cardholders) to modify their behavior and to
change it in such a way that it does harm or deprives the
second group (acceptors) of their money,
or that defrauds
them in any other manner,
while at the same time
preventing those whom such actions is directed against
from protecting themselves, that
such actions become a
series of criminal acts. As such, then every U.S.
Attorney's office in every state should be investigating these
executives and their corporations as conspirators in a
massive national and international fraud.
Each State's Attorney General should be
conducting an investigation
as well, that the protection of their retail businesses and
service providers from such harmful business practices
is of paramount importance, and it is the duty of the Federal and State
governments to seek to end them and penalize those who are
involved, such as the major banks and credit card issuers
and franchisors.
Among the
participants are many of the best known corporate names in the
country, such as the names of every major bank associated with the
Credit Card industry, Citibank, MBNA, Bank of America, Wells
Fargo, Bank One, and their greedy partners in rapaciousness,
Visa, MasterCard and Discover, American Express, Diners
Club, among others. It is not the ordinary
development of a business that leads to schemes and fraudulent
actions; it is purely greed that drives those who find ever
more devious ways to enrich themselves while stripping
others of their rightful profits.
I've grown
to strongly dislike these international banks, these
monstrous financial institutions, so much so that my rhetoric
might sound more like a Marxist rather than a dyed-in-the-wool
believer in the capitalist system. I believe in
democracy; I believe in free enterprise; I believe in my
country and I take to heart every word in the Declaration of
Independence, our Constitution and the various Amendments
to it. I dislike Communism, Marxism and
Socialism.
THERE
SHOULD BE A CLASS ACTION SUIT! To Demand: Terminate of Air
Miles. Stop Using Bribery to defraud business owners of their
profits!
Statement: We believe that Air Miles, and the
use of bribery as advocated and used by certain members
of the Credit/Charge Card Cartel to steal Retailers’
profits, should be terminated immediately. (July 30,
2002)
Retailers must be Reimbursed for Losses (Bank
Charges) over the past ten years due to Air Miles: Bank
service fees connected with credit cards have increased
thousands of dollars annually for many Retailers. Large
Retailers are paying out tens to hundreds of thousands of
dollars more annually, and the culprits are either Air
Miles or Refunds by Charge and Credit Card
companies. Merchants should be reimbursed for all losses
suffered through the fraud known as Air Miles,
based upon their yearly percentage of increases in sales on
plastic between 1992 and 2002, plus interest and punitive
damages. It's time for US to recover OUR losses from
this crooked scheme! (Class Action
Suit).
Consumers
Air Miles should be Compensated (Bought Out) at 3 Cents
per Mile:
The tremendous
accumulation of Air Miles (reportedly 7 1/2 trillion miles in
2002) by Consumers, indicates that likely most of it is not
redeemable by U.S. Airlines. Consumers should be compensated
at the rate of three (3) cents a mile for their credits. (i.e.
250,000 miles at 3 cents per mile = $7,500 cash payout.) This
is roughly the amount of money “stolen” from the business
owners, and offered to their clients as Air Miles; it
rightfully (or wrongfully) should be paid to the Consumers.
These payments can be applied to balances on some cards, which
would help the Cardholders considerably.
Local Banks Should Support Local Merchants in
Defeating Air Miles: Local bank officers in agreement
with this position should publicly acknowledge the injustice
of the use of bribery through the use of Air Miles, rebates,
refunds, and other perks, as a responsible step and in support
of their local business owners. While the
Visa/MasterCard/American Ex-Cess contract forbids us to
discount in order to discourage use of a charge or credit
card, they, in effect, are discounting our merchandise. Not
only that, but they are using our money to do
it.
"Air Miles"
rewards the users of Credit Cards with a "discount", which
penalizes the customer who pays with cash or check. This is
adverse to the interests of the Retailers and forces them to
accept conditions which are contrary to their best interests
and welfare.
The the
customer using plastic to make his payment receives "Air
Miles" as a reward, and it is in effect a discount. Therefore
he pays a lower price than the one who pays with Cash or
Check.
If a customer
pays a thousand dollar invoice with cash or check, the
Retailer receives his price in full. If that customer used an
American Express card, he only receives $960. If that customer
uses Visa, MasterCard or Discover, then he receives $980. In
one instance the Retailer loses $40 and in the other
$20. He should not be forced into a position where the
money is "taken" from him.
It is like
forcing Union membership upon those who, on principle, do not
wish to join. However, the Union works to benefit the
workers. The Credit Card Industry does this to benefit
and enrich themselves at the expense of business
owners.
Therefore,
because of the chicanery of the Visa & MasterCard banking
interests, as well as American Express, Retailers are locked
into an Agreement that forces them to reward customers who use
costly plastic, thereby forcing them to treat their cash
customers disadvantageously. The ones who benefit the
most are those who the least profitable to the banking
industry, who take additional discounts from the sellers
because of the chicanery of the Credit Card Cartel. It
makes the cash customer "a fool" for being honest and paying
his bill in full.
It rewards the
"chiseler" who uses his plastic cards on every purchase in
order to gain free "Air Miles" or other rewards. It has
turned us into a nation of chiselers, plastic cheap chiselers,
doing the dirty work for the Banking and Credit Card
industry.
Next Page -
Click Here
|