THE VFW AND THE

MERCHANT MARINE

THE MEN WHO "SHIPPED OUT" IN THE MERCHANT MARINE...

The men who sailed as merchant seamen during W.W.II were not then considered members of the Armed Forces, neither Army, Navy, Marine Corps, nor Air Force, so when the war ended, they simply went about their business as merchant seamen, or returned home to civilian life once again, and in spite of being on every action front, they were not given the status or designation of Veterans of World WarII.

The men in the Merchant Marine were seamen, every single one of them.  They had to go to sea, and they had no civilians or state-side duty.  It was all sea-duty and once you left port, you were in enemy waters. No one was called a Merchant Seaman who was not signing on and shipping out and working aboard one type of vessel or another. The men and women who worked in the company offices or on the docks were not seamen, and did not earn a Discharge from a shipo; only those who actually sailed and worked aboard the merchant ships were seamen.

Only the seamen who worked the ships and the U.S. Naval Armed Guard were 100% active and in the war zones from the minute the ship left port until it returned home. The Army, the Air Force, the Navy and the Marine Corps had a large percentage of their men and women continuously in the United States or in support teams well behind the enemy lines abroad. This is not in criticism of those who served to suipport the troops on the front line, a ration of about seven men and women to support each man in action.  This is a fact too often overlooked by people today.

The merchant ships, as long as they were at sea, were in danger 24 hours a day in every ocean in the world. While some World's seas were relatively free of enemy activity, none could be considered 100% safe.

No seaman or member of the Armed Guard went to sleep in his bunk at night without being aware of the danger of a torpedo crashing through the bulkheads and sinking his ship. I can truthfully say that I never knew a man aboard who seemed overly concerned about such fears, and I personally never gave it more than a passing thought to it at any time in any war zone; it is something that one just gets accustomed to, accepts, and it becomes part of the job. Yes, we talked about it on occassion, or discussed the German battle cruiser known to be in a Norwegian fjord, but again, we were alert to this danger, but not spoooked by it.

Today, in retrospect, I cannot believe that we were that naieve, or possibly just that innocent or perhaps just plain dumb. Ahhh, the innocense of youth! Yet, the Captain, Chief Mate and Chief Engineer were at least men in their thirties to sixties, so they had more since than us younger fellows.

Even the men who had been on ships that had been hit and sunk by torpedoes seemed as carefree as us younger guys. Hell, most of us were between 18 and 23, except for DeLuca, a member of the Armed Guard, whom I believe was only 17. We were serious while at work; we were carefree in our off hours. There were no complaints, no signs of fear, no lost appetites (even directly after action), and no bravado either. We even had a cook aboard, a skinny little guy from Belguim, who was 70. Imagine, going into a war zone at that age when you don't have to do so! Our Captain was 56, other officers, like Johnny Olson, 67, if I remember right.

We were the only major service without color bars, and we had men of every hue and nationality among our crews. While the U.S.N. Armed Guard was exclusively white, they sailed aboard ships with negroes, as they were known then. Northerner and southerner alike worked with and accepted it. I heard men from the deep south express pretty strong feelings against negroes, but we never had a racial incident, that I can remember. (It was not until after the war that one black man, from Philadelphia, showed hatred towards me and other white crew members.)

My reason for these statements concerns the on-going attitude of the VFW towards admitting the Merchant Marine into their sacred organization, as if in some manner we will besmirch it. Millions of overseas veterans in the Armed Forces never saw action, never were in danger from the enemy, yet they're accepted as members. Merchant seamen risked their lives every single day they were at sea. Every day. I had one shipmate, who signed aboard the S.S. U.S.O. without a second thought, even though he knew full well (as most of us did) that we were heading across the North Atlantic for Scotland And then for Murmansk, USSR, known as the toughest run of them all. On his previous trip to Murmansk his ship had been torpedoed and he was rescued from the water, and the rescue ship was sunk on the return voyage.


AN ACT OF CONGRESS IN 1985 ACKNOWLEDGED THE MEN OF THE MERCHANT MARINE AS MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES DURING THE WAR. MY U.S. COAST GUARD HONORABLE DISCHARGE STATES THAT IN THOSE WORDS.
I THINK THAT THE V.F.W. HAS AN ATTITUDE PROBLEM.
During wartime, most new seamen were formally trained by the U.S. Government at U.S. Maritime schools and academies, and we were paid by the U.S. treasury. The Maritime Service issued their own combat bars, but some few exceptions were made and some merchant seamen who were wounded or killed in action, receive the Purple Heart. If some received this medal, then all wounded, MIA or KIA should have been entitled to the same honor!

We were later (1985) granted official U.S. Coast Guard discharges and granted Veteran's status. That should entitle us to wear the same combat ribbons as other Veterans.

Not only this, but after the Merchant ships were armed, technically they were warships and able to fight back. One lone man on one merchant ship, manning the big gun aft, hit a German raider amidships and it exploded and sank. He was a Cadet from the U.S. Maritime Academy from King's Point, New York. I would argue that we served aboard Auxillary Warships, and we were trained and able to assist the U.S. Armed Guard at their battle stations, and we often did. Merchant Seamen replaced wounded or killed U.S. Navy Armed Guard at their battle stations, fully taking part in fighting off enemy ships, subs, torpedo boats and planes.

Now, tell me, tell me why men who served in Scotland or other places out of harms way are welcome and men who were veterans of many actions are not? Give me an answer? Just once, give me an answer? If there is something in your Articles that stands between us and membership, then it can be changed in the same manner that Congress voted and granted us the status of VETERANS! All it takes is a little understanding and a bit of work.

The sole reason for a lot of animosity used to be the difference in compensation, the claim that the merchant seamen earned a lot more for taking the same risks as the U.S. Navy Armed Guard. The history of this and I know full well, the reasoning behind it I am familiar with, perhaps one of those still alive who does. The man who stirred up the most trouble over it I met in the early sixties, Westbrook Pegler, a Hearst columnist who hated Joe Curran, president of the National Maritime (Seaman's) Union. He was a great writer and had three hates, Joe Curran, Eleanor Roosevelt and Harry Bridges. He wrote some scathing columns about our earnings versus the men in the military, the differential, and it was at a boiling point during the war.

First of all, U.S. merchant ships were at risk and being attacked and sunk before Pearl Harbor. At the outset of the war, merchant ships were as yet unarmed, often too aged and slow, and unable to defend themselves even if attacked by a sub on the surface using only their deck gun. Every newspaper in the country referred to them as sitting ducks when they went to sea, even the faster Liberty ships when they joined the war effort. The old, slow freighters from WWI were still being used at first, but they were most vunerable and one by one, fell victim to the subs and German raider ships. U.S. Navy destroyers sat in harbors up and down the coast while merchant ships sailed out to sea alone and were sunk directly out of the mouth of New York harbor, along the coast, and off-shore near Florida and in sight of tourists in their hotel rooms in Miami. To encourage more men to sign on the new Liberty ships rapidly being launched on both east and west coasts by the Kaiser Shipyards, the U.S. government offered bonuses. In fact, Joe Curran fought for them because of the huge risks his seamen were taking, while Admiral King did nothing in those early days to protect them. Again, Merchant ships at the time were running alone, without escorts and without armor and without guns! In fact, my friends were telling me, "Howard, pick the Navy. You'll have guns, armor and speed. Those Liberty ships are sitting ducks. But by the time I was old enough to return to sea (yes, I had sailed at 16, during the previous summer vacation) we had a convoy system and escort vessels. But, the bonus system, once in place, was allowed to continue in order to keep the flow of young men into the Maritime schools uninterrupted. It also served to keep the older, more experienced seamen aboard ships when they could have retired. They were not drafting men over 34 years of age, if I recall correctly, but seamen had no limitations. Two children could earn you a pass on doing time in the service, but seamen with five and six kids were signing on merchant ships and keeping up the flow of supplies to the men overseas.

If the pay differential is another reason for the intransignance of the V.F.W. to make changes, then that's total bull-crap (pardon an old sailor's language) and they know it. If they went overseas, then, they'll understand that language a bit easier and quicker.

TO THE BIGOTED MEMBERS OF THE V.F.W. I SAY...
Open the doors, while there are still a few merchant seamen around who earned those Coast Guard discharges and bring them into your ranks. You're not that much a Sacred Cow that we're going to soil your ranks or reputation. Our men earned it just as much as you did. Our men took you there, brought all your equipment there, fought to get it there, and then carried you home again. Most of the guys I knew are gone now, but they were proud of the job they did during WWII, and if for no other reason, this is written in their memory and dedicated to them. The few pictures I have, in spite of cameras being forbidden aboard ship, bring back memories of thosE days and those men I sailed with. They look the same to me as the pictures of your buddies and comrades do to you, young guys who risked the most important thing they had to bring you and your buddies those supplies so that you could move forward and win your battles, they risked their lives every day they were at sea.

WE WERE YOUR COMRADES ALL THE WAY, FROM START TO FINISH. YOU'VE IGNORED OUR HELP AND OUR SACRIFICES FOR TOO LONG. WE DESERVE THE SAME RIGHTS, THE SAME PRIVILEGES, AND THE SAME GLORY...AS YOU!!!

WHAT GENERAL PAUL TIBBETS SAYS:
I have an email in my files, to me, personally, from General Paul Tibbets, and he says, "The Merchant Marine were the unsung heroes of WWII." Well, I truly believe that he's right and that they were.

Even the Russians, to this day, honor those of us who brought cargos to them via Murmansk. They honored us with a medal in 1985. Then, they issued a Fifty Year medal honoring the English, Norwegian and American merchant seamen who made the Murmansk Run. Now, tell me that the V.F.W. cannot see the light in view of what the Russian government has done? DISCHARGED FROM THE ARMED FORCES: I know this, that my Discharge says that during WWII, I was a Member of the Armed Forces. I know this too, that as a Member of the Armed Forces, I am entitled to wear the Campaign Ribbons the same as any other man or woman who served during WWII. I am going to buy a set and wear them on every holiday dedicated to the Armed Forces. I will dare anyone to say I am not permitted to do so, or to order me arrested for doing so. It is not that I am not proud of the Ribbons awarded by the U.S. Maritime Service. It is simply that I will no longer be denied full credit for serving in WWII, proudly, with my shipmates. While many men in the VFW never were in a combat zone, merely serving overseas, every seaman was in such a war zone the moment we cleared port ande dropped off the pilot. Wear your floppy caps cocked over your right eye with the VFW emblem, boys, but without the men of the Merchant Marine to bring you the bombs and ammunition, the gas and oil, and the rations, there would have been no Victory! In most cases, we took you there and we brought you home, as well as the supplies we carried. There wasn't a place in the World that the Merchant Marine did not go, if our men were there. Howard E. Morseburg

[an error occurred while processing this directive] Copyright © 2006 Howard's Views. All Rights Reserved.

THE V.F.W. HAS NEVER BEEN SUPPORTIVE IN ANY OFFICIAL WAY OF THE MEN WHO SERVED IN THE MERCHANT MARINE.  THEY HAVE OPPOSED, WITHOUT GOOD REASON, THE AWARDING OF A SPECIAL MONTHLY BO9NUS TO THOSE OF US WHO STILL SRUVIVE AFTER OUR SERVICE DURING WWII.

There is no valid reason for their lack of support, no valid reason for them to continue this disgraceful treatment of those who served alongside them during ghe war, and indeed, supported them in almost every theatre of war.

The Story of the Sinking of the S.S. Amapala by the German submarine, U507